On the Port Phillip website you'll find the following titbit of information. It makes for informative reading when compared to the current attitudes of our clowncil -
Dog Owner Groups
Many popular parks have their own unofficial dog owner groups that get together to socialise with their pets. These groups can be a great way to get to know people in your area and to allow your dog to socialise and play with other dogs. The people in these groups take good care of their parks, helping to promote responsible pet ownership.
Some of these groups are advancing into more official groups such as Alma Dog Group at Alma Park in St Kilda East. Alma Dog Group recently worked with the Animal Management unit to host Port Phillips first Pet Expo in April 2006. Council is actively encouraging more groups like Alma Dogs to be created as they help to promote responsible pet ownership and encourage community togetherness.
Another park that has quite a social dog group is Gasworks park which is located in Middle Park. This park is an off-leash park that is used by many dogs for their playtime. The regulars to Gasworks have become quite an organised group.
Peanut Farm Reserve in St Kilda and Clarke Reserve in Elwood are two more examples of parks that are very popular in their neighbourhoods. These parks have active groups of regulars that enjoy spending time socialising with their dogs in the parks.
So if you are new to an area or to being a dog owner, talk to people in your neighbourhood about local doggy activities and news. If you are a new visitor to a park, it's a good idea to talk to other park users to see if there is a group of regulars that get together as it is a great way for you and your pooch to make some new friends.
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Thursday, June 18, 2009
The puppet speaks!
A 'Letter to the Editor' from Helen Whiteside - but who's really pulling the strings?
"Regarding your story on the protest at Lord Reserve in Carnegie (Leader June 3). The partial fence in Lord Reserve is not a complete barrier to children, dogs or balls. There were entry and exit points all along the old fence.
Over the years, council's approach has been to try and remove barriers to access and encourage people to participate in both active and passive recreation in our parks.
There can never be a safer alternative to the proper supervision of children in any environment, whether it be the local park or the children's own home.
Where fences have been removed from other parks, usage has increased.
It is a legal requirment for people walking their dog that it is always under effective voice control, even in an off-leash area.
The police became involved in ensuring work could continue after the contractor had not been able to safely access the work site for three days, the contractor's property was damaged and the safety measures around the work site were breached.
"Regarding your story on the protest at Lord Reserve in Carnegie (Leader June 3). The partial fence in Lord Reserve is not a complete barrier to children, dogs or balls. There were entry and exit points all along the old fence.
Over the years, council's approach has been to try and remove barriers to access and encourage people to participate in both active and passive recreation in our parks.
There can never be a safer alternative to the proper supervision of children in any environment, whether it be the local park or the children's own home.
Where fences have been removed from other parks, usage has increased.
It is a legal requirment for people walking their dog that it is always under effective voice control, even in an off-leash area.
The police became involved in ensuring work could continue after the contractor had not been able to safely access the work site for three days, the contractor's property was damaged and the safety measures around the work site were breached.
Monday, June 8, 2009
The latest Burke outrage!!!
From today's (Tuesday) Leader: See - http://caulfield-glen-eira-leader.whereilive.com.au/news/story/please-fence-us-in/
Please, fence us in: Carnegie protestors
09 Jun 09 @ 07:00am by Jenny Ling
Protesters, children and dogs gathered at Lord Reserve to try to stop Glen Eira Council pulling down the fence. PIC: DAVID SMITH
PARENTS and dog owners angry at a council decision to tear down a Carnegie park fence have been criticised for hurling “derogatory” remarks at workmen and vandalising their property.
Dozens of residents picketed Lord Reserve for several days from May 25 after Glen Eira Council contractors began removing a 1.2m fence to make way for a small concrete plinth.
Police escorted them off the site on May 28.
Group spokeswoman Sandy Evans said residents would “continue to lobby the councillors until someone talks to us”.
“They are simply not interested in what the electorate wants or needs and don’t feel it’s necessary to tell us what’s being done with our money,” Ms Evans said.
Residents are concerned children and dogs will run on to the road once the fence is removed.
Most of the fence had been taken down from the Lyons St side, Ms Evans said.
Council spokesman Paul Burke said the work, expected to take two weeks, had been delayed by a week after the contractor was told to leave the site during the protests.
Group members had cut through a temporary wire safety fence to get inside the work area and made “derogatory” comments, he said.
“The contractor said he’s prepared to wear it on the chin,” Mr Burke said. “But nobody likes their equipment vandalised and the fact people bad-mouthed workmen going about their jobs was unnecessary.”
Dog owners fear the plinths will be installed at other parks.
Please, fence us in: Carnegie protestors
09 Jun 09 @ 07:00am by Jenny Ling
Protesters, children and dogs gathered at Lord Reserve to try to stop Glen Eira Council pulling down the fence. PIC: DAVID SMITH
PARENTS and dog owners angry at a council decision to tear down a Carnegie park fence have been criticised for hurling “derogatory” remarks at workmen and vandalising their property.
Dozens of residents picketed Lord Reserve for several days from May 25 after Glen Eira Council contractors began removing a 1.2m fence to make way for a small concrete plinth.
Police escorted them off the site on May 28.
Group spokeswoman Sandy Evans said residents would “continue to lobby the councillors until someone talks to us”.
“They are simply not interested in what the electorate wants or needs and don’t feel it’s necessary to tell us what’s being done with our money,” Ms Evans said.
Residents are concerned children and dogs will run on to the road once the fence is removed.
Most of the fence had been taken down from the Lyons St side, Ms Evans said.
Council spokesman Paul Burke said the work, expected to take two weeks, had been delayed by a week after the contractor was told to leave the site during the protests.
Group members had cut through a temporary wire safety fence to get inside the work area and made “derogatory” comments, he said.
“The contractor said he’s prepared to wear it on the chin,” Mr Burke said. “But nobody likes their equipment vandalised and the fact people bad-mouthed workmen going about their jobs was unnecessary.”
Dog owners fear the plinths will be installed at other parks.
Sunday, June 7, 2009
The community speaks!
The following are comments submitted to the Leader in response to Glen Eira Clowncil's handling of the Lord Reserve fiasco and the calling in of police -
Michael writes:Posted on 5 Jun 09 at 11:48am
What a waste of money, it’s a great park that has a fence that does the job, why change whats not needed. If the council need to do anything they should resurface Lyons Street if they have the money to spend.
Kim writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 10:48pm
Annabel Orchard wrote: “Any letter to the Mayor is read out in the Council chamber...” Ahh, no it’s not. If you want something read out to the Chamber you need to ask a Public Question (and then get a sarcy non-answer read out by Paul Burke). But don’t let this stop you from writing to Helen and asking her things - and if she doesn’t respond within 4 working days lodge a complaint with the Ombudsman.
Carly Griffen writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 09:11pm
Once again no community consultation and a total disregard for the needs of parents and dog owners. The problem Glen Eira ratepayers have is that we have no effective voice control over the council!
Rosetta writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 07:23pm
Just to correct the comment by Annabel. If you write to the Mayor IT WILL NOT BE READ OUT IN COUNCIL MEETINGS!! This must be done via a formal public question of no more than 150 words, and with your name and landline phone number included. Emails or letters must be headed ‘public questions’ and must arrive at council prior to 12pm on the day of council meeting (next Tuesday). Unlike other councils you may not speak/address council, nor will any comments be entered into. All letters and answers are read out by Paul Burke. mail@gleneira.vic.gov.au
FYI there are numerous other councils which allow residents to speak/address councillors at formal council meetings. Other councils also hold monthlyr ‘community’ forums that are geared to allowing the voice of the resident to be heard. This is not the case with Glen Eira.
Maisy Brown writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 06:58pm
- If aesthetics is the reason, why not replace the plinth with a more attractive fence? - unless a footpath is built on the outside of the fence next to Lyons Rd, the park will be no more accessible to wheelchairs or people with limited mobility - the fence protected not only children and dogs, but also the drivers along Lyons Rd - the council rep said the plinth had worked in Packer Park and Princes Park, but Lord Reserve is much smaller, and the off-leash area is closer to the road. Does the council think one size fits all? - Lord Reserve is a ground for ball-sports. Can the coach effectively supervise a whole team of kids? Are parents expected to supervise their children when they are practising sport with their team and coaches? Exactly how fast and how far are parents expected to be able to run? - a recent council seminar on children encouraged parents to allow their children to learn independence, and to let them go to the park in groups. What do the council’s child experts theink of the removal of the fence?
Annabel Orchard writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 06:38pm
I am going to ask the Council to replace the fence. I walk in Lord Reserve with my toddler and dog, but will no longer feel comfortable to do so without the fence. I supervise my dog and child carefully, but as any parent knows, sometimes a child or dog will follow an irresistible temptation, and the fence helped make the walk a relaxing experience. Did the council think through this change? Was any research done on child or dog behavior?
I urge concerned residents to write to the Mayor Helen Whiteside. Any letter to the Mayor is read out in the Council chamber, so your requests will be heard by council. Write to: Mayor Helen Whiteside, PO Box 42 Caulfield South 3162; or email mayor@gleneira.com.au Meanwhile I will be asking the council to make the fenced area in Koornang Park an off-leash area.
Tracey Malady writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 02:20pm
Why? To what purpose is the Council removing the existing fence and replacing it with a small, unsafe barrier? Why would anyone put young children’s safety at risk? This move by the Council seems to be so insane that i just cannot think of any reason they would proceed with it. Replace the fence maybe, but don’t remove it. Councillors, what is wrong with community consultation and open discussion? Please re-think and open the doors for communication. There is no harm in that as opposed to a child chasing a ball onto the roads!
Phil writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 02:04pm
This is not surprising from a council that sees it self as above the law & is anti-healthy activities like do walking. This is further evidence that Councils should be abolished & taken over by State Government. ratepayers are sick of idiots on Councils who see themselves as partliamentarians rather than the faceless, unaccountable, immaterial money wasters that they are.
antony writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 01:02pm
Absolute rubbish… I have resided on Lyons st for the past 25 + years! In that time there has not been a single ‘hoon’ inside that park. It would not be possible to enter even if the thought was prevalent, without the use of bolt cutters (to cut the lock off the gates!) It is a myth, it has never happened.
This is dangerous and not very well thought out at all.
Our Caulfield based councillors are out of touch!
Michael Marshal... writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 09:20am
This is typical arrogance on the part of a council that only plays lip service to consulting the community that it is supposed to serve. I live opposite the reserve and have not spoken to one person who supports the removal of the existing fence.
Five years ago a number of mature trees were removed from the reserve on so called safety grounds, and at that time Lord Reserve was referred to by the council as a sports ground, not a park. Now because it suits the councils purpose they seem to be caliing it a park again!
Perhaps at the next council elections we can get some councillors elected who will actually represent the residents who vote for them, and not waste money on projects that no one wants.
fiona mccrae writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 02:35pm
It is clear whoever made this decision doesn’t have children or dogs. We have two young children and two old dogs, one of which is deaf and loves chasing balls. I will not feel safe taking my children or dogs to the park and we live opposite it. It will be a terrible accident waiting to happen. And if aesthetics are so important, why not seal the çar park’on Munro Ave - it is unsightly and hoons love it. We are very disappointed with this whole situation.
george writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 01:21pm
What was so aesthetically unpleasing about the 1.2m wire fence that upgraded its priority for removal and a new concrete border put in its place? When did aesthetics out weight safety and community needs? Also, are there not other more pressing issues that need taken care of in our community before replacing a fully functional fence that is in very good condition serving the community already? I hope the council does not decide to remove all existing fencing around children playgrounds and schools. I always thought the council worked for the community. Perhaps it is time everyone have a really good think what the council candidates really represent or miss-represent when we next vote. Don’t judge a book by its cover.
Steven writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 12:53pm
To confirm what everyone already knows the State Government’s Community Satisfaction Survey on Glen Eira reveals a further erosion of confidence in this council’s capacity to listen and act upon residents’ concerns. Year after year the perennial lament is poor community consultation and advocacy. Check out the results on council’s website - it is incontravertible proof that the community is not taken in by the ‘public relations’ exercises so poorly performed by Burke and that councillors must lift their game and finally accord the community the respect they deserve.
Ross writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 11:57am
Can Mr Burke please explain why these works were carried out with no prior consultation with councillors or local residents. Makes a mockery of their so- called “community consultation” process.
And, does Mr Burke really, really, really believe the mini concrete blocks will keep vehicles off the the reserve
Glenn writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 11:42am
Paul Burke and indeed the council have again missed the point of the protest… it’s not only about dogs, are parents also told by council when a potential risk is identified that children should also be kept under effective control in an open park?
Therese Caruana writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 11:28am
The decision to remove the fence from Lord’s Reserve is so poorly thought out it’s laughable. Unfortunately it’s also a terrible waste of money, places children and dogs at risk and demonstrates a complete lack of regard for the needs and opinions of the rate payers who actually use the park. The lack of consultation is a slap in the face. Has anyone in the council thought about the number of children who play soccer there on a Sunday? The patronising comment by a council employee that parents should supervise their children and that dogs off the leash should be under voice control sounds like it’s coming from someone who hasn’t had a lot to do with either dogs or children. And what about the anxiety the removal of the fence will create for dog owners and parents, or even those who take both a dog and a child or children to the park? Going to a park should be a relaxing occasion, not one involving hyper-vigilance.
Cherryl writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 09:41am
As a grandmother of children who live in Lyons Street I beg the Council to replace the fence which was a helpful safety measure.
Will Hunter writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 12:13am
Honestly, is this council fair dinkum? What an absurd and utterly disgraceful waste of taxpayers’ money. The popular pool across the road is in a state of disrepair and the ajacent lane, with all its irregular cracks and leaf litter is a safety hazard (my mother spend a couple of years recovering from a broken femur sustained in a fall in the lane). But rather that addressing those issues, the council decides to tear down the fence enlosing the off-leash park and replace it with a plinth curb, allowing dogs and children easy access to the surrounding roads. But their justification for this smacks of sheer stupidity. Apparently a 1.2m high fence can’t prevent hoons driving on to the oval for a bit of circle work, but a 20cm concrete barrier can. It’s also clear that “aesthetic value” takes precendence over safety. There was no prior consultation with residents, who clearly condemn this lunacy, and finally the councillors have the nerve to award themselves salary rises for a job well done. Absolutely shameful.
Bianca writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 09:47pm
The dog walking community has been complaining for years that their needs have not been taken seriously by Council.
Perhaps now that the parents community has had a taste of the disenfranchisement suffered by the dog-owning community, they will realize that their safety concerns overlap. What is good for one community, is usually good for the other.
And Council blithely goes its own way, with no concern for the substantive issues.
Aesthetics should never trump safety! It’s indefensible.
Ian writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 08:31pm
Surely the existing wire fence keeps vehicles off the park ? Did anyone from council bother to ask the user community ? Was this “enhancement” documented in a program of works for Lord Reserve ? How about council spending money on upgrading the park facilities, instead of “aesthetics”? It worries me particularly when local government is given “stimulus” money to spend on infrastructure that they can’t spend it responsibly....
Lesley Baker writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 07:17pm
Is there a pyschiatrist in the house? What lunacy by the council to replace a safe fence with a small concrete pinth TO KEEP HOONS OUT!!! That should attract them if anything. One would have thought keeping children and animals safe would have a greater priority...but then the ratepayers of Glen Eira, their safety and their rights to be heard are secondary to the mania prevailing in this Council. Calling police to ‘quell the riot’ confirms their mental status.
Kev writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 07:06pm
Clown Hall did you say? Can’t the Council just admit they got it wrong? Time to return to the drawing board before more money is squandered.
Why was the fence even considered for removal, no rust, no paint job needed, why would anyone interested in protecting children and dogs safety have done such a thing?.
The CEO should be held responsible for the lack of a risk management plan here and sack the guy responsible for displaying such a gross lack of consideration for residents.
And the same for the guy who brought the cops into the picture!
Marilyn Stephen... writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 05:05pm
I want secure fencing at Lord Reserve and all other parks in Glen Eira. A plinth curb will not stop children, balls or dogs from running onto the road, nor 4-wheel vehicles from driving onto the park. Dogs should be under effective voice control and children are taught not to run onto the road, however in the real world both dogs and children can be distracted and follow a ball onto the road. Further, some dog walkers have children too: a proper fence provides security when both dogs and children have to be watched.
Melody writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 04:56pm
I’d like to put a question to Mr Burke - if it was one of his kids that was hurt chasing a ball (or a dog) across the road - an accident that could have been prevented had the park been properly fenced - what would his reaction be if the Council told him he had to have his child appropriately supervised (or dog under voice control)? Would he trade the safety of something he loved for the concrete asthetics of a park? I think not.
Moira writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 04:44pm
Yet another example of our astoundingly mediocre council arrogantly ignoring the needs of it’s ratepayers and thinking that some poorly conceived ‘spin’ is all that is required to smooth things over. The pathetic attempt to deflect responsibility for adequate municipal amenities onto dog owners through the tired old line of ‘effective voice control’ just confirms their stupidity. I wonder how ‘aesthetically pleasing’ a small child or animal is going to look when they have had the inevitable collision with a vehicle on Lyons Rd.
David writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 02:57pm
To answer the original question posed at the bottom of the article: I want a secure fence to be maintained at Lord Reserve, as well as at any other parks in Glen Eira which adjoin busy sidestreets. The plinth curb will do nothing to stop children, balls or dogs from running on the road. I agree that dogs should be under effective voice control but, in the real world, both dogs and children are not immune from unexpected distractions. I am disappointed that Council has chosen to remove this extra safeguard without any public consultation. I encourage anyone else concerned about this to contact Council asap, before the entire fence is ripped down.
Mary Walsh writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 12:29pm
I found it difficult to understand how such a stupid planning design got past first base in the office. Who was consulted? Who made the decision? Who called in the police to quell the riot? Only now I learn the plinth is about keeping cars out and has nothing to do with keeping dogs and children in!! Looks apparently rate more highly than “Safety First”!
Shame on a system that allows the absolute waste of public money with no redress by the ratepayers to prevent it. Residents thought they had a voice in Council with the Councillors, but the devil in the details, delegated to the Administration who rarely answer to anyone!
I doubt we’ll wait long before the first dog is maimed or killed!
Evan writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 11:59am
If concrete blocks are the answer to keeping hoons out of public parks, then how much more effective would steel fences be? As to ‘aesthetics’, then tell that to the mother of a child knocked down by a car whilst chasing a cricket ball. And what a sorry state of affairs, when police are called in to remove a passive bunch of mothers, children, and aged residents from a public park.
Kim writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 11:51am
Burke’s comments make no sense. The existing fence would have stopped hoons driving onto the ovals. The plinths are so low I can imagine a 4WD could get over them. And he totally ignores the issues of kids and balls.
Why is Council so concrete happy? They concrete everything. The newly installed plinths in Wattle Grove Park are much more obtrusive and ugly than the series of low green poles that they pulled out. And the newly developed Joyce Park has more concrete and pathways than park!
Finally, what anal retentive in Council thinks it so important that all our parks look the same?
Michael writes:Posted on 5 Jun 09 at 11:48am
What a waste of money, it’s a great park that has a fence that does the job, why change whats not needed. If the council need to do anything they should resurface Lyons Street if they have the money to spend.
Kim writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 10:48pm
Annabel Orchard wrote: “Any letter to the Mayor is read out in the Council chamber...” Ahh, no it’s not. If you want something read out to the Chamber you need to ask a Public Question (and then get a sarcy non-answer read out by Paul Burke). But don’t let this stop you from writing to Helen and asking her things - and if she doesn’t respond within 4 working days lodge a complaint with the Ombudsman.
Carly Griffen writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 09:11pm
Once again no community consultation and a total disregard for the needs of parents and dog owners. The problem Glen Eira ratepayers have is that we have no effective voice control over the council!
Rosetta writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 07:23pm
Just to correct the comment by Annabel. If you write to the Mayor IT WILL NOT BE READ OUT IN COUNCIL MEETINGS!! This must be done via a formal public question of no more than 150 words, and with your name and landline phone number included. Emails or letters must be headed ‘public questions’ and must arrive at council prior to 12pm on the day of council meeting (next Tuesday). Unlike other councils you may not speak/address council, nor will any comments be entered into. All letters and answers are read out by Paul Burke. mail@gleneira.vic.gov.au
FYI there are numerous other councils which allow residents to speak/address councillors at formal council meetings. Other councils also hold monthlyr ‘community’ forums that are geared to allowing the voice of the resident to be heard. This is not the case with Glen Eira.
Maisy Brown writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 06:58pm
- If aesthetics is the reason, why not replace the plinth with a more attractive fence? - unless a footpath is built on the outside of the fence next to Lyons Rd, the park will be no more accessible to wheelchairs or people with limited mobility - the fence protected not only children and dogs, but also the drivers along Lyons Rd - the council rep said the plinth had worked in Packer Park and Princes Park, but Lord Reserve is much smaller, and the off-leash area is closer to the road. Does the council think one size fits all? - Lord Reserve is a ground for ball-sports. Can the coach effectively supervise a whole team of kids? Are parents expected to supervise their children when they are practising sport with their team and coaches? Exactly how fast and how far are parents expected to be able to run? - a recent council seminar on children encouraged parents to allow their children to learn independence, and to let them go to the park in groups. What do the council’s child experts theink of the removal of the fence?
Annabel Orchard writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 06:38pm
I am going to ask the Council to replace the fence. I walk in Lord Reserve with my toddler and dog, but will no longer feel comfortable to do so without the fence. I supervise my dog and child carefully, but as any parent knows, sometimes a child or dog will follow an irresistible temptation, and the fence helped make the walk a relaxing experience. Did the council think through this change? Was any research done on child or dog behavior?
I urge concerned residents to write to the Mayor Helen Whiteside. Any letter to the Mayor is read out in the Council chamber, so your requests will be heard by council. Write to: Mayor Helen Whiteside, PO Box 42 Caulfield South 3162; or email mayor@gleneira.com.au Meanwhile I will be asking the council to make the fenced area in Koornang Park an off-leash area.
Tracey Malady writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 02:20pm
Why? To what purpose is the Council removing the existing fence and replacing it with a small, unsafe barrier? Why would anyone put young children’s safety at risk? This move by the Council seems to be so insane that i just cannot think of any reason they would proceed with it. Replace the fence maybe, but don’t remove it. Councillors, what is wrong with community consultation and open discussion? Please re-think and open the doors for communication. There is no harm in that as opposed to a child chasing a ball onto the roads!
Phil writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 02:04pm
This is not surprising from a council that sees it self as above the law & is anti-healthy activities like do walking. This is further evidence that Councils should be abolished & taken over by State Government. ratepayers are sick of idiots on Councils who see themselves as partliamentarians rather than the faceless, unaccountable, immaterial money wasters that they are.
antony writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 01:02pm
Absolute rubbish… I have resided on Lyons st for the past 25 + years! In that time there has not been a single ‘hoon’ inside that park. It would not be possible to enter even if the thought was prevalent, without the use of bolt cutters (to cut the lock off the gates!) It is a myth, it has never happened.
This is dangerous and not very well thought out at all.
Our Caulfield based councillors are out of touch!
Michael Marshal... writes:Posted on 4 Jun 09 at 09:20am
This is typical arrogance on the part of a council that only plays lip service to consulting the community that it is supposed to serve. I live opposite the reserve and have not spoken to one person who supports the removal of the existing fence.
Five years ago a number of mature trees were removed from the reserve on so called safety grounds, and at that time Lord Reserve was referred to by the council as a sports ground, not a park. Now because it suits the councils purpose they seem to be caliing it a park again!
Perhaps at the next council elections we can get some councillors elected who will actually represent the residents who vote for them, and not waste money on projects that no one wants.
fiona mccrae writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 02:35pm
It is clear whoever made this decision doesn’t have children or dogs. We have two young children and two old dogs, one of which is deaf and loves chasing balls. I will not feel safe taking my children or dogs to the park and we live opposite it. It will be a terrible accident waiting to happen. And if aesthetics are so important, why not seal the çar park’on Munro Ave - it is unsightly and hoons love it. We are very disappointed with this whole situation.
george writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 01:21pm
What was so aesthetically unpleasing about the 1.2m wire fence that upgraded its priority for removal and a new concrete border put in its place? When did aesthetics out weight safety and community needs? Also, are there not other more pressing issues that need taken care of in our community before replacing a fully functional fence that is in very good condition serving the community already? I hope the council does not decide to remove all existing fencing around children playgrounds and schools. I always thought the council worked for the community. Perhaps it is time everyone have a really good think what the council candidates really represent or miss-represent when we next vote. Don’t judge a book by its cover.
Steven writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 12:53pm
To confirm what everyone already knows the State Government’s Community Satisfaction Survey on Glen Eira reveals a further erosion of confidence in this council’s capacity to listen and act upon residents’ concerns. Year after year the perennial lament is poor community consultation and advocacy. Check out the results on council’s website - it is incontravertible proof that the community is not taken in by the ‘public relations’ exercises so poorly performed by Burke and that councillors must lift their game and finally accord the community the respect they deserve.
Ross writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 11:57am
Can Mr Burke please explain why these works were carried out with no prior consultation with councillors or local residents. Makes a mockery of their so- called “community consultation” process.
And, does Mr Burke really, really, really believe the mini concrete blocks will keep vehicles off the the reserve
Glenn writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 11:42am
Paul Burke and indeed the council have again missed the point of the protest… it’s not only about dogs, are parents also told by council when a potential risk is identified that children should also be kept under effective control in an open park?
Therese Caruana writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 11:28am
The decision to remove the fence from Lord’s Reserve is so poorly thought out it’s laughable. Unfortunately it’s also a terrible waste of money, places children and dogs at risk and demonstrates a complete lack of regard for the needs and opinions of the rate payers who actually use the park. The lack of consultation is a slap in the face. Has anyone in the council thought about the number of children who play soccer there on a Sunday? The patronising comment by a council employee that parents should supervise their children and that dogs off the leash should be under voice control sounds like it’s coming from someone who hasn’t had a lot to do with either dogs or children. And what about the anxiety the removal of the fence will create for dog owners and parents, or even those who take both a dog and a child or children to the park? Going to a park should be a relaxing occasion, not one involving hyper-vigilance.
Cherryl writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 09:41am
As a grandmother of children who live in Lyons Street I beg the Council to replace the fence which was a helpful safety measure.
Will Hunter writes:Posted on 3 Jun 09 at 12:13am
Honestly, is this council fair dinkum? What an absurd and utterly disgraceful waste of taxpayers’ money. The popular pool across the road is in a state of disrepair and the ajacent lane, with all its irregular cracks and leaf litter is a safety hazard (my mother spend a couple of years recovering from a broken femur sustained in a fall in the lane). But rather that addressing those issues, the council decides to tear down the fence enlosing the off-leash park and replace it with a plinth curb, allowing dogs and children easy access to the surrounding roads. But their justification for this smacks of sheer stupidity. Apparently a 1.2m high fence can’t prevent hoons driving on to the oval for a bit of circle work, but a 20cm concrete barrier can. It’s also clear that “aesthetic value” takes precendence over safety. There was no prior consultation with residents, who clearly condemn this lunacy, and finally the councillors have the nerve to award themselves salary rises for a job well done. Absolutely shameful.
Bianca writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 09:47pm
The dog walking community has been complaining for years that their needs have not been taken seriously by Council.
Perhaps now that the parents community has had a taste of the disenfranchisement suffered by the dog-owning community, they will realize that their safety concerns overlap. What is good for one community, is usually good for the other.
And Council blithely goes its own way, with no concern for the substantive issues.
Aesthetics should never trump safety! It’s indefensible.
Ian writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 08:31pm
Surely the existing wire fence keeps vehicles off the park ? Did anyone from council bother to ask the user community ? Was this “enhancement” documented in a program of works for Lord Reserve ? How about council spending money on upgrading the park facilities, instead of “aesthetics”? It worries me particularly when local government is given “stimulus” money to spend on infrastructure that they can’t spend it responsibly....
Lesley Baker writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 07:17pm
Is there a pyschiatrist in the house? What lunacy by the council to replace a safe fence with a small concrete pinth TO KEEP HOONS OUT!!! That should attract them if anything. One would have thought keeping children and animals safe would have a greater priority...but then the ratepayers of Glen Eira, their safety and their rights to be heard are secondary to the mania prevailing in this Council. Calling police to ‘quell the riot’ confirms their mental status.
Kev writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 07:06pm
Clown Hall did you say? Can’t the Council just admit they got it wrong? Time to return to the drawing board before more money is squandered.
Why was the fence even considered for removal, no rust, no paint job needed, why would anyone interested in protecting children and dogs safety have done such a thing?.
The CEO should be held responsible for the lack of a risk management plan here and sack the guy responsible for displaying such a gross lack of consideration for residents.
And the same for the guy who brought the cops into the picture!
Marilyn Stephen... writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 05:05pm
I want secure fencing at Lord Reserve and all other parks in Glen Eira. A plinth curb will not stop children, balls or dogs from running onto the road, nor 4-wheel vehicles from driving onto the park. Dogs should be under effective voice control and children are taught not to run onto the road, however in the real world both dogs and children can be distracted and follow a ball onto the road. Further, some dog walkers have children too: a proper fence provides security when both dogs and children have to be watched.
Melody writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 04:56pm
I’d like to put a question to Mr Burke - if it was one of his kids that was hurt chasing a ball (or a dog) across the road - an accident that could have been prevented had the park been properly fenced - what would his reaction be if the Council told him he had to have his child appropriately supervised (or dog under voice control)? Would he trade the safety of something he loved for the concrete asthetics of a park? I think not.
Moira writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 04:44pm
Yet another example of our astoundingly mediocre council arrogantly ignoring the needs of it’s ratepayers and thinking that some poorly conceived ‘spin’ is all that is required to smooth things over. The pathetic attempt to deflect responsibility for adequate municipal amenities onto dog owners through the tired old line of ‘effective voice control’ just confirms their stupidity. I wonder how ‘aesthetically pleasing’ a small child or animal is going to look when they have had the inevitable collision with a vehicle on Lyons Rd.
David writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 02:57pm
To answer the original question posed at the bottom of the article: I want a secure fence to be maintained at Lord Reserve, as well as at any other parks in Glen Eira which adjoin busy sidestreets. The plinth curb will do nothing to stop children, balls or dogs from running on the road. I agree that dogs should be under effective voice control but, in the real world, both dogs and children are not immune from unexpected distractions. I am disappointed that Council has chosen to remove this extra safeguard without any public consultation. I encourage anyone else concerned about this to contact Council asap, before the entire fence is ripped down.
Mary Walsh writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 12:29pm
I found it difficult to understand how such a stupid planning design got past first base in the office. Who was consulted? Who made the decision? Who called in the police to quell the riot? Only now I learn the plinth is about keeping cars out and has nothing to do with keeping dogs and children in!! Looks apparently rate more highly than “Safety First”!
Shame on a system that allows the absolute waste of public money with no redress by the ratepayers to prevent it. Residents thought they had a voice in Council with the Councillors, but the devil in the details, delegated to the Administration who rarely answer to anyone!
I doubt we’ll wait long before the first dog is maimed or killed!
Evan writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 11:59am
If concrete blocks are the answer to keeping hoons out of public parks, then how much more effective would steel fences be? As to ‘aesthetics’, then tell that to the mother of a child knocked down by a car whilst chasing a cricket ball. And what a sorry state of affairs, when police are called in to remove a passive bunch of mothers, children, and aged residents from a public park.
Kim writes:Posted on 2 Jun 09 at 11:51am
Burke’s comments make no sense. The existing fence would have stopped hoons driving onto the ovals. The plinths are so low I can imagine a 4WD could get over them. And he totally ignores the issues of kids and balls.
Why is Council so concrete happy? They concrete everything. The newly installed plinths in Wattle Grove Park are much more obtrusive and ugly than the series of low green poles that they pulled out. And the newly developed Joyce Park has more concrete and pathways than park!
Finally, what anal retentive in Council thinks it so important that all our parks look the same?
Monday, June 1, 2009
The logic of Burke!!!
FROM TODAY'S LEADER - PAGE ONE
http://caulfield-glen-eira-leader.whereilive.com.au/news/story/deathtrap-fear-for-fenceless-carnegie-park/
Deathtrap fear for fenceless Carnegie park
DOG owners and parents are protesting at a Carnegie park to stop council contractors removing a fence they say will lead to children’s deaths.
Dozens of angry residents picketed Lord Reserve for four days to oppose Glen Eira Council’s plans to tear down the 1.2m-high steel fence and install a small plinth curb.
Group spokeswoman Sandy Evans said the fence’s removal at the off-leash park would enable dogs and children to run out on to Lyons St. Mrs Evans said residents would go back “until somebody talks to us and explains why they’re taking away a perfectly good fence and putting up an 8in (20cm) barrier”.
“That’s not going to stop children or balls or anything,” she said.
“Little kids follow balls out on to the road.
“How many children’s deaths will it take before they decide they have made the wrong decision?”
Mrs Evans said there was no consultation about the “absolutely stupid” plan, which would cost $60,000.
Despite police urging the group to move on last Thursday, protesters had already stalled the work for several days when the Leader went to press.
About 10 people protested last Monday, 30 the following morning and the number of people swelled to 60 that night.
Residents were taking turns to make sure people were there during daylight hours.
Council spokesman Paul Burke said the plinth curb stopped hoons driving on to ovals and added “aesthetic value” to parks.
He said dog owners should have their pets under effective voice control".
LOGIC LESSONS:
1. if concrete plinths are meant to stop hoons invading parks then how much better would a steel 4 foot fence be?
2. I wonder how the mother of a killed child would respond to the argument that the 'aesthetics' of the park needed improving and to hell with 'safety'?
3. Must children also be under 'effective voice control'?
http://caulfield-glen-eira-leader.whereilive.com.au/news/story/deathtrap-fear-for-fenceless-carnegie-park/
Deathtrap fear for fenceless Carnegie park
DOG owners and parents are protesting at a Carnegie park to stop council contractors removing a fence they say will lead to children’s deaths.
Dozens of angry residents picketed Lord Reserve for four days to oppose Glen Eira Council’s plans to tear down the 1.2m-high steel fence and install a small plinth curb.
Group spokeswoman Sandy Evans said the fence’s removal at the off-leash park would enable dogs and children to run out on to Lyons St. Mrs Evans said residents would go back “until somebody talks to us and explains why they’re taking away a perfectly good fence and putting up an 8in (20cm) barrier”.
“That’s not going to stop children or balls or anything,” she said.
“Little kids follow balls out on to the road.
“How many children’s deaths will it take before they decide they have made the wrong decision?”
Mrs Evans said there was no consultation about the “absolutely stupid” plan, which would cost $60,000.
Despite police urging the group to move on last Thursday, protesters had already stalled the work for several days when the Leader went to press.
About 10 people protested last Monday, 30 the following morning and the number of people swelled to 60 that night.
Residents were taking turns to make sure people were there during daylight hours.
Council spokesman Paul Burke said the plinth curb stopped hoons driving on to ovals and added “aesthetic value” to parks.
He said dog owners should have their pets under effective voice control".
LOGIC LESSONS:
1. if concrete plinths are meant to stop hoons invading parks then how much better would a steel 4 foot fence be?
2. I wonder how the mother of a killed child would respond to the argument that the 'aesthetics' of the park needed improving and to hell with 'safety'?
3. Must children also be under 'effective voice control'?
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Might is never right!
The Glen Eira Clowncil administration has once again revealed its true colours. Police have been called in to remove a bunch of kids, women, aged residents, and young men, from the Lord St. Reserve - ie public land! These protestors were there simply because:
1. clowncil contractors had moved in (unannounced) early one morning and started to demolish a fence that was regarded by residents and sporting clubs as a safety fence to stop balls entering a busy road alongside.
2. residents were outrated at the lack of warning, the lack of discussion, and the lack of consultation.
All of the above are pointers to what is wrong with this clowncil. It is one that operates on the simple principle of bullying and 'might is right'.
Where have the principles of 'governing' for the community gone? What has happened to the idea of locals being in the best position to determine what is good for their locality? What is wrong with halting such works and sitting down and discussing the problem in a civilised and respectful manner? But I guess this is all too much for clowncil and its paid henchmen!
1. clowncil contractors had moved in (unannounced) early one morning and started to demolish a fence that was regarded by residents and sporting clubs as a safety fence to stop balls entering a busy road alongside.
2. residents were outrated at the lack of warning, the lack of discussion, and the lack of consultation.
All of the above are pointers to what is wrong with this clowncil. It is one that operates on the simple principle of bullying and 'might is right'.
Where have the principles of 'governing' for the community gone? What has happened to the idea of locals being in the best position to determine what is good for their locality? What is wrong with halting such works and sitting down and discussing the problem in a civilised and respectful manner? But I guess this is all too much for clowncil and its paid henchmen!
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Sound familiar??
From the just released ombudsman's report into Brimbank and ask: how different is this clowncil on this point at least?
In spite of their view that a mayor should have certain characteristics,
several councillors referred to the custom in Brimbank of councillors
taking turns to be mayor and noted that the mayoralty was something
to be shared. Dr A. Theophanous regarded the taking of turns as
reflecting the democratic principle. Cr Suleyman was described as
‘greedy’ for wanting to stand a fourth time for mayor before others had
had their turn.
913. It is clear that, at Brimbank, the mayor was elected because councillors
perceived it to be that person’s turn; and also that the mayoralty
may be used as a reward for supporting a certain faction. Ms Duncan
commented to my officers that ‘Brimbank is famous for what happens
on election night for a mayor’, with factions settled at the last minute
when mayoralty deals are made. Councillors also spoke about
Brimbank’s mayoral elections being the subject of comment in other
cities.
914. There was no evidence that a councillor was, between 2005 and 2008,
elected as mayor because of any relevant strength or ability, but rather
because of a deal done between councillors, based on whose turn it was.
In spite of their view that a mayor should have certain characteristics,
several councillors referred to the custom in Brimbank of councillors
taking turns to be mayor and noted that the mayoralty was something
to be shared. Dr A. Theophanous regarded the taking of turns as
reflecting the democratic principle. Cr Suleyman was described as
‘greedy’ for wanting to stand a fourth time for mayor before others had
had their turn.
913. It is clear that, at Brimbank, the mayor was elected because councillors
perceived it to be that person’s turn; and also that the mayoralty
may be used as a reward for supporting a certain faction. Ms Duncan
commented to my officers that ‘Brimbank is famous for what happens
on election night for a mayor’, with factions settled at the last minute
when mayoralty deals are made. Councillors also spoke about
Brimbank’s mayoral elections being the subject of comment in other
cities.
914. There was no evidence that a councillor was, between 2005 and 2008,
elected as mayor because of any relevant strength or ability, but rather
because of a deal done between councillors, based on whose turn it was.
Friday, April 10, 2009
Screwed once more!!!!!
The 'democratic' process in this clowncil, and its residents, have once again been screwed - but properly this time. Appearing in today's Age is a tender advertisement for a contractor for the Acquatic centre. We have repeatedly been told that council has not yet decided whether this will go ahead, whether 50 odd million dollars will be spent and our rates increase continually. So why this advertisement? Has clowncil learnt that it has now got the 10 million dollar grant? Even if they do know this, then the decision to advertise for contractors must still be passed by a full council meeting?
Also worthy of mention is the fact that the tender ads include the date 2007 and 2008 - in other words DECISIONS HAVE ALREADY BEEN MADE!! Councillors, the public, are superfluous. This is merely another example of how this clowncil operates. It is all done with smoke and mirrors and behind closed doors. Governance is dead - long live democratic processes in other councils.
Also worthy of mention is the fact that the tender ads include the date 2007 and 2008 - in other words DECISIONS HAVE ALREADY BEEN MADE!! Councillors, the public, are superfluous. This is merely another example of how this clowncil operates. It is all done with smoke and mirrors and behind closed doors. Governance is dead - long live democratic processes in other councils.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
A Leopard never changes its spots!
This month's Glen Eira news contains a feature on 'dog training'. We are assailed with the benefits of training our animals as well as the importance of registration. But, and this is a huge but - has clowncil provided any INFO as to where to go to get a dog trained? Have they provided any contact details for local obedience schools, even though they have included a photo of a local trainer without giving his details, name, etc. How typical!!! Whereas other councils proudly proclaim on their websites organisations, and local doggy groups, that can assist residents - all that this clowncil can do is provide pretty pictures and platitudes! Not worth the paper it's written on as far as 'informing' local residents of what's available and where they can get assistance if they want. Like leopard spots, this clowncil's lack of imagination, and will to really provide for its pet owning population remains unchanged.
Monday, March 30, 2009
California 'dreamin' comes to McKinnon Road.
I've just learnt why it will take THREE MONTHS to install a roundabout at the corner of Thomas St. and McKinnon Road. The answer is that 4 PALM TREES are going to adorn the roundabout!! This of course means plumbing, water systems, etc., not to mention the cost. But more importantly - why the hell plant palm trees on, or in, a roundabout, that will potentially block off views? Isn't the purpose of a roundabout to ensure safety, and traffic control that provides a full 360 degree line of sight? Will this be another disaster as evidenced by the planting of trees along Centre Rd. which now block off drivers' vision as they attempt to park, or enter the various main and side streets. I simply want to know which genuis designed these fiascos, at what cost, and how it can be argued to be either an aesthetic or a safety improvement?
Monday, March 23, 2009
Some councillors do have balls!!!!!
The following Leader article stems from another council - one that is obviously represented by people with some sense of community responsibility. By way of contrast with our clowncil they have refused to be 'gagged'; they insist on speaking directly to and for the people they represent - unlike glen eira and its gag which only allows the mayor to speak for others - that is of course after her words have been carefully crafted by the spin doctors. All other councillors in glen eira have allowed their mouths (brains?) to be stitched up!
18 Mar 09 @ 09:00am by Dimity Barber
Casey Mayor Geoff Ablett
A MOVE to silence Casey councillors from speaking to the media has been defeated. As reported by the Berwick Leader today, Casey top media executive Ros Weadman wrote a report urging all communication between councillors and the media be handled by the high paid public relations crew.
But at last night’s council meeting, the community’s elected representatives made it clear they would not accept the policy changes, including:
*A ban on the media questioning councillors directly;
*All media enquiries to be filtered through the communications department for “co-ordination of a response’’; and
*Councillors to ask permission from the communications department before talking to the media directly.
In a unanimous vote, councillors made it clear they would not be gagged and told Ms Weadman to go back to the drawing board.
Casey Mayor Geoff Ablett said big business adopted a “co-ordinated approach” to PR, and so should the city. “Otherwise we are doing things willy nilly,” he said.
But Cr Wayne Smith said he was disturbed by some of the policy changes.
“I don’t believe an organisation can tell a councillor they can’t approach the media. It’s crazy. It wouldn’t happen at any other council and it shouldn’t happen here,” Cr Smith said.
Cr Lorraine Wreford said the changes were “highly inappropriate”.
“It feels like an attempt to gag us,” Cr Wreford said.
“What about the free-flow of information to our community? This is a free country.”
Cr Sam Aziz said the city should take a consultative approach and work with councillors to come up with a “less restrictive” policy.
Cr Kevin Bradford also urged caution.
“The communications policy is one of the most important we have at council. It’s about what information our community has access to,” he said.
“We need to find a fair balance between allowing elected representatives to have democratic free speech while protecting the name of the City of Casey.”
Councillors will debate the matter behind closed doors before the end of April.
18 Mar 09 @ 09:00am by Dimity Barber
Casey Mayor Geoff Ablett
A MOVE to silence Casey councillors from speaking to the media has been defeated. As reported by the Berwick Leader today, Casey top media executive Ros Weadman wrote a report urging all communication between councillors and the media be handled by the high paid public relations crew.
But at last night’s council meeting, the community’s elected representatives made it clear they would not accept the policy changes, including:
*A ban on the media questioning councillors directly;
*All media enquiries to be filtered through the communications department for “co-ordination of a response’’; and
*Councillors to ask permission from the communications department before talking to the media directly.
In a unanimous vote, councillors made it clear they would not be gagged and told Ms Weadman to go back to the drawing board.
Casey Mayor Geoff Ablett said big business adopted a “co-ordinated approach” to PR, and so should the city. “Otherwise we are doing things willy nilly,” he said.
But Cr Wayne Smith said he was disturbed by some of the policy changes.
“I don’t believe an organisation can tell a councillor they can’t approach the media. It’s crazy. It wouldn’t happen at any other council and it shouldn’t happen here,” Cr Smith said.
Cr Lorraine Wreford said the changes were “highly inappropriate”.
“It feels like an attempt to gag us,” Cr Wreford said.
“What about the free-flow of information to our community? This is a free country.”
Cr Sam Aziz said the city should take a consultative approach and work with councillors to come up with a “less restrictive” policy.
Cr Kevin Bradford also urged caution.
“The communications policy is one of the most important we have at council. It’s about what information our community has access to,” he said.
“We need to find a fair balance between allowing elected representatives to have democratic free speech while protecting the name of the City of Casey.”
Councillors will debate the matter behind closed doors before the end of April.
Saturday, March 21, 2009
When is one's word a word?
It appears that 'real politik', or cowtowing to certain powerbrokers and administrators at clowncil, means that one's word given prior to an election comes to nought! Tuesday's clowncil meeting is proof of this in spades. Instead of an Animal Management Committee that looked like it might actually be capable of making some considered recommendations regarding policy and strategic directions, certain individuals have decided that the committee will really be a committee in name only. The carried amendment in effect emasculates the entire committee - it has limited its terms of reference to only the state legislation, as well as conceded that its purview will extend to only 'existing' facilities. In other words, nothing will be reviewed, investigated, changed, etc. The positions are now clear - pet owners within this municiipality remain personae non gratis. Their only value is the near one million dollar revenue they provide to this money-grubbing lot each year. But as far as 'service', listening to what the community wants and needs, well that goes by the board. Yes councillors - promise all you like before an election, but when it comes to keeping your word, then forget it!
The other interesting item concerns caulfield park and the further destruction of trees, the creation of more concrete (fenced this time) and the blatant mistruths that all this 'rearrangement' was forecast in a 1999 Master Plan. Again, the hypocrisy is staggering. If clowncil is so convinced of its argument, then let the world see this master plan - put it up on the website for all to glean where the truth really lies. But of course, this will never be done!!
Now for the fiasco of the pools public forum on the 25th. Can't wait to see the dissembling, double takes, and undoubted hyperbole as to what a wonderful clowncil this is. This will be nothing more than another orchestrated event with the puppet masters pulling all the strings. Should be an interesting evening. Come one and all to witness this staged performance.
The other interesting item concerns caulfield park and the further destruction of trees, the creation of more concrete (fenced this time) and the blatant mistruths that all this 'rearrangement' was forecast in a 1999 Master Plan. Again, the hypocrisy is staggering. If clowncil is so convinced of its argument, then let the world see this master plan - put it up on the website for all to glean where the truth really lies. But of course, this will never be done!!
Now for the fiasco of the pools public forum on the 25th. Can't wait to see the dissembling, double takes, and undoubted hyperbole as to what a wonderful clowncil this is. This will be nothing more than another orchestrated event with the puppet masters pulling all the strings. Should be an interesting evening. Come one and all to witness this staged performance.
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Glen Huntly and Clowncil's Neglect
From this week's Leader newspaper -
A GROUP of Glen Huntly mums has joined pleas to spruce up the shabby Glen Huntly Rd shopping strip after “decades of non-action”.
Mischa Brus contacted the Leader after our February 24 report that traders were fed up with the state of the area, which they said was neglected by Glen Eira Council.
In a letter to the council Mrs Brus said the area was a “dirty disgrace” and urged the council to act. “The Glen Huntly shopping zone is a dirty disgrace and its residents insist the Glen Eira Council fully upgrade the precinct,” Mrs Brus said.
“It appears funds are allocated to other suburbs but not Glen Huntly.”
Mrs Brus said several areas were unsafe, including a veranda above one shop that was close to collapsing. A huge flashing sign above the Posh Opportunity Shop was distracting and dangerous to motorists, she said.
Simone Waterman takes her three young children to parks outside the area because she said nearby play equipment was outdated and unsafe. The issue is a long-standing one.
The Glen Huntly Progress Group has been lobbying the council for changes since 2002. The group submitted a petition signed by 86 traders calling for improvements in 2006 and a year later unveiled a plan for the precinct.
But “nothing’s happened,” spokesman Orek Tenan said.
Council spokesman Paul Burke said trees worth $20,000 would be planted along the shopping strip in autumn. But Mr Tenan said more funding was needed to beautify the area.
A GROUP of Glen Huntly mums has joined pleas to spruce up the shabby Glen Huntly Rd shopping strip after “decades of non-action”.
Mischa Brus contacted the Leader after our February 24 report that traders were fed up with the state of the area, which they said was neglected by Glen Eira Council.
In a letter to the council Mrs Brus said the area was a “dirty disgrace” and urged the council to act. “The Glen Huntly shopping zone is a dirty disgrace and its residents insist the Glen Eira Council fully upgrade the precinct,” Mrs Brus said.
“It appears funds are allocated to other suburbs but not Glen Huntly.”
Mrs Brus said several areas were unsafe, including a veranda above one shop that was close to collapsing. A huge flashing sign above the Posh Opportunity Shop was distracting and dangerous to motorists, she said.
Simone Waterman takes her three young children to parks outside the area because she said nearby play equipment was outdated and unsafe. The issue is a long-standing one.
The Glen Huntly Progress Group has been lobbying the council for changes since 2002. The group submitted a petition signed by 86 traders calling for improvements in 2006 and a year later unveiled a plan for the precinct.
But “nothing’s happened,” spokesman Orek Tenan said.
Council spokesman Paul Burke said trees worth $20,000 would be planted along the shopping strip in autumn. But Mr Tenan said more funding was needed to beautify the area.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Duped once more!!
You just gotta love this - a 'consultation' advisory committee, that has just had its terms of reference published without 'consultation'!!!! That's right - the powers that be, have handed down their dictum - thou shalt not 'consult' with people; thou shalt do nothing except repeat the ongoing mantra consisting of motherhood statements with no substance; thou shalt think with your own minds only when we allow you to; though shalt meekly follow us into oblivion and the public speak of a 'low cost' clowncil!!! Thou must expunge all thought of 'democracy' and the principles of good governance; thou must vote in these terms of reference, since we know best!!! Thou must not consider essential questions such as 'community participation', 'evaluation', accountability and how this could have been enshrined in such terms of reference. Nor must you allow yourselves to ever contemplate the possibility that stakeholders from all sectors of the community will ever sit on such a committee - god forbid, this would signal the fall and fall of newton and his henchmen!
The commandments remain set in stone. They consist of:
1. we run the roost and you do our bidding
2. the public are nothing but an ignorant , troublemaking mob and must be silenced
3. never ask questions about strategic planning, policy directions, budgets - they remain our domain
4. we know best in everything
5. avoid so and so - they are 'troublemakers'
6. never put anything into writing, just smile, nod your head, and repeat the fact that you are working for the good of all the community
7. accept your lowly positions on arts and crafts committees - that's all we are willing to entrust you with
8. sign anything we put in front of you and pretend that it is your view
9. never speak ill us - it's like taking the lord's name in vain
10. don't concern yourself with how other councils manage things better - this will only confuse you!
The commandments remain set in stone. They consist of:
1. we run the roost and you do our bidding
2. the public are nothing but an ignorant , troublemaking mob and must be silenced
3. never ask questions about strategic planning, policy directions, budgets - they remain our domain
4. we know best in everything
5. avoid so and so - they are 'troublemakers'
6. never put anything into writing, just smile, nod your head, and repeat the fact that you are working for the good of all the community
7. accept your lowly positions on arts and crafts committees - that's all we are willing to entrust you with
8. sign anything we put in front of you and pretend that it is your view
9. never speak ill us - it's like taking the lord's name in vain
10. don't concern yourself with how other councils manage things better - this will only confuse you!
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Plans 'just too big'
From today's front page Moorabbin/Glen Eira Leader. Please note this follows on from my last post re the Station St. 3 storey 'sell out' (pun intended!)
"McKinnon residents are furious at Glen Eira City Council's decision to approve a three storey devellpment in their street. Nine objections were lodged against the proposed units at 3 Station Ave, which include 28 independent living units for people aged over 55. McKinnon resident Robert Bell said neighbours were angry the council last week approved the proposal despite Mayor Margaret Esakoff (sic) and Cr. Steven Tang opposing it.
'There are a number os issues we have with these building but scale is the main one", Mr Bell said. 'It's just too big for the area; the visual bulk, density and mass of the devellpment is not sympathetic to the streetscape'.
Mr Bell, who lives opposite the site, believed overshadowing would be a problem during winter. 'We will enver see another sunset', he dais. 'The building will be right opposite my bedroom window."
Parking issues were also a problem with the proposal, he said, with only nine spaces allocated to the site. Fellow resident Dominim Calabrese said he was also angry at the decision. 'The council have not listened to our concerns and for that we have lost all faith in them' Mr Calabrese said.
As part of the project, six single-storey units a 5 Station Ave wil also be built for dependent residents with multiple sclerosis. Last September the council sold the block to the Port Phillip Housing Association, Department of Human services and the Multiple Sclerosis Society for $3.1 million. Cr. Esakoff said although she supported providing independent living to low-income earners, she did not agree with the size, lack of parking and the increased traffic congestion the project would cause. Cr. Tang believed the height of the building would set a precedent for future devllpments. However, Cr Michael Lipshutz said he was confident all conerns over the proposal could be satisfied.
COMMENT: no surprises here of course! How could this mob knock back 3.1 million if they opposed the development? This was fait accompli. What should have happened is that the original sale never went through. So is this merely an example of 'crocodile tears' from Esakoff and Tang? The pretense of really caring about the local residents. And then we have Liphutz's supreme and arrogant 'confidence' that people would be satisfied. I realise that Lipshutz believes that he is god's gift to Glen Eira, but is he really so powerful as to ensure the sunlight remains for Mr. Bell - that he directs the heavens as well as his weak-kneed colleagues? Once more - shame on the whole lot of you!!!
"McKinnon residents are furious at Glen Eira City Council's decision to approve a three storey devellpment in their street. Nine objections were lodged against the proposed units at 3 Station Ave, which include 28 independent living units for people aged over 55. McKinnon resident Robert Bell said neighbours were angry the council last week approved the proposal despite Mayor Margaret Esakoff (sic) and Cr. Steven Tang opposing it.
'There are a number os issues we have with these building but scale is the main one", Mr Bell said. 'It's just too big for the area; the visual bulk, density and mass of the devellpment is not sympathetic to the streetscape'.
Mr Bell, who lives opposite the site, believed overshadowing would be a problem during winter. 'We will enver see another sunset', he dais. 'The building will be right opposite my bedroom window."
Parking issues were also a problem with the proposal, he said, with only nine spaces allocated to the site. Fellow resident Dominim Calabrese said he was also angry at the decision. 'The council have not listened to our concerns and for that we have lost all faith in them' Mr Calabrese said.
As part of the project, six single-storey units a 5 Station Ave wil also be built for dependent residents with multiple sclerosis. Last September the council sold the block to the Port Phillip Housing Association, Department of Human services and the Multiple Sclerosis Society for $3.1 million. Cr. Esakoff said although she supported providing independent living to low-income earners, she did not agree with the size, lack of parking and the increased traffic congestion the project would cause. Cr. Tang believed the height of the building would set a precedent for future devllpments. However, Cr Michael Lipshutz said he was confident all conerns over the proposal could be satisfied.
COMMENT: no surprises here of course! How could this mob knock back 3.1 million if they opposed the development? This was fait accompli. What should have happened is that the original sale never went through. So is this merely an example of 'crocodile tears' from Esakoff and Tang? The pretense of really caring about the local residents. And then we have Liphutz's supreme and arrogant 'confidence' that people would be satisfied. I realise that Lipshutz believes that he is god's gift to Glen Eira, but is he really so powerful as to ensure the sunlight remains for Mr. Bell - that he directs the heavens as well as his weak-kneed colleagues? Once more - shame on the whole lot of you!!!
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Curioser and curioser!
The agenda items are out for clowcil's next meeting (Tuesday night). What is fascinating about some of the items is:
1. The 3.1 Million selloff to the Port Phillip Housing society is up for planning approval. A few questions need to be asked. According to the report, it is anticipated that for the 3 STOREY dwelling, most of the occupants will be over 55. So, will there be a lift? If not, what is the sense of allowing a 3 storey building for the elderly? Or is this just another lot of codswallop and the final makeup of residents will be 'disadvantaged' and not necessarily 'elderly'? Also, after being told that the MS society will be a major benefactor, it looks as if only 6 out of the proposed 34 units will actually house people with MS - since it is feasible to assume that they won't be put into a 3 storey building!
2. How come that Neil Pilling, the GREENS candidate for the recent election is not a member of the environment committee? Did he get rolled? Did he want to be on this committee?
3. And most intruiging is that in the 'in camera' items we have the following:
"12.3 under S 89(2)(a) “personnel” which relates to Membership of the Audit
Committee". What does this mean? That the natives are getting restless and that the 6 to 3 vote which placed Lipshutz and Tang on the committee is perhaps being challenged, questioned?
Are things are really getting curioser and curioser. Keep watching!
1. The 3.1 Million selloff to the Port Phillip Housing society is up for planning approval. A few questions need to be asked. According to the report, it is anticipated that for the 3 STOREY dwelling, most of the occupants will be over 55. So, will there be a lift? If not, what is the sense of allowing a 3 storey building for the elderly? Or is this just another lot of codswallop and the final makeup of residents will be 'disadvantaged' and not necessarily 'elderly'? Also, after being told that the MS society will be a major benefactor, it looks as if only 6 out of the proposed 34 units will actually house people with MS - since it is feasible to assume that they won't be put into a 3 storey building!
2. How come that Neil Pilling, the GREENS candidate for the recent election is not a member of the environment committee? Did he get rolled? Did he want to be on this committee?
3. And most intruiging is that in the 'in camera' items we have the following:
"12.3 under S 89(2)(a) “personnel” which relates to Membership of the Audit
Committee". What does this mean? That the natives are getting restless and that the 6 to 3 vote which placed Lipshutz and Tang on the committee is perhaps being challenged, questioned?
Are things are really getting curioser and curioser. Keep watching!
Monday, February 16, 2009
The PUPPETS speak!!!!
If anyone wanted any 'proof' as to the orchestrated nature of all public statements made by our councillors here is the 'proof'. I refer to the latest media release where Mayor Whiteside is congratulating residents on exchanging the 4000th showerhead in the effort to save water. She is purported to have said (and I quote) - Glen Eira Mayor Cr Helen Whiteside said by installing 3 star water efficient showerheads, households will not only save up to 20,000 litres of water a year, but will also use less energy.
"Using less energy means a reduction in fossil fuel use and fewer greenhouse gases entering the atmosphere," Cr Whiteside said.
Now, let's go to a clowncil media release of May 19th, 2008 where our then Mayor, Steven Tang, is reported to have opined (and again I quote) - Glen Eira Mayor Cr Steven Tang said by installing the AAA rated showerhead, households will not only save about 20,000 litres of water a year, but they will also use less energy.
"Using less energy means a reduction in fossil fuel use and fewer greenhouse gases entering the atmosphere," Cr Tang said.
COME ON!!!!! Surely as 'puppet-master' you can do better than this Mr. Burke? All it achieves is showing the community how little real say our elected councillors have, and how much effort you actually put into these spurious media releases. Even a 12 year old kid knows the dangers of plagiarism! More importantly, what does it say about the intelligence and independent thought of Tang and Whiteside. It is now clear to all as to who is actually pulling the strings.
"Using less energy means a reduction in fossil fuel use and fewer greenhouse gases entering the atmosphere," Cr Whiteside said.
Now, let's go to a clowncil media release of May 19th, 2008 where our then Mayor, Steven Tang, is reported to have opined (and again I quote) - Glen Eira Mayor Cr Steven Tang said by installing the AAA rated showerhead, households will not only save about 20,000 litres of water a year, but they will also use less energy.
"Using less energy means a reduction in fossil fuel use and fewer greenhouse gases entering the atmosphere," Cr Tang said.
COME ON!!!!! Surely as 'puppet-master' you can do better than this Mr. Burke? All it achieves is showing the community how little real say our elected councillors have, and how much effort you actually put into these spurious media releases. Even a 12 year old kid knows the dangers of plagiarism! More importantly, what does it say about the intelligence and independent thought of Tang and Whiteside. It is now clear to all as to who is actually pulling the strings.
Looks as if we're not alone - today's Leader
GLEN Eira Council has been dubbed “thoughtless” for not making an immediate cash donation to help in the wake of the Australia’s worst natural disaster.
Donations of more than $93 million have poured in from individuals, organisations and councils for the Victoria bushfire appeal so far.
But 10 days after the fires destroyed so many families and houses, Glen Eira Council - with a surplus of $5.23 million for the 2008-09 financial year - had not pledged any cash.
In a statement, Mayor Helen Whiteside said the council was “making available” equipment, vehicles and staff with expertise to help affected areas.
The council could not say how many staff or vehicles were available to help.
When the Leader asked if money would be donated, council spokesman Paul Burke stated in an email that councillors were “finalising the details” of a donation and a formal decision was likely to be made today.
“The amount will be in excess of $10,000,” he said.
Mr Burke said the council would organise a charity concert in March.
Glen Eira Residents’ Action Group president Andrew Bunn said he didn’t understand the delay.
“It’s a tragedy that’s touched all Australians so it’s surprising to me they have delayed in any way showing at least a little generosity ... that’s thoughtless,” he said.
“All Australians are feeling for these people and donating.
“There should be no need for a meeting or major discussion.”
Carnegie resident Mary Walsh said the council media release had a “total lack of recognition of the human costs involved”.
Donations of more than $93 million have poured in from individuals, organisations and councils for the Victoria bushfire appeal so far.
But 10 days after the fires destroyed so many families and houses, Glen Eira Council - with a surplus of $5.23 million for the 2008-09 financial year - had not pledged any cash.
In a statement, Mayor Helen Whiteside said the council was “making available” equipment, vehicles and staff with expertise to help affected areas.
The council could not say how many staff or vehicles were available to help.
When the Leader asked if money would be donated, council spokesman Paul Burke stated in an email that councillors were “finalising the details” of a donation and a formal decision was likely to be made today.
“The amount will be in excess of $10,000,” he said.
Mr Burke said the council would organise a charity concert in March.
Glen Eira Residents’ Action Group president Andrew Bunn said he didn’t understand the delay.
“It’s a tragedy that’s touched all Australians so it’s surprising to me they have delayed in any way showing at least a little generosity ... that’s thoughtless,” he said.
“All Australians are feeling for these people and donating.
“There should be no need for a meeting or major discussion.”
Carnegie resident Mary Walsh said the council media release had a “total lack of recognition of the human costs involved”.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
well, well, well - the pen is mightier......
Well, well, well - it looks like the mandarins running clowncil may just have been shamed into further action on the bushfire appeal front. I cite their latest 'update' -
Bushfire update 12 February 2009
Councillors are finalising the details of the donation that Council will make to the Bushfire Appeal Fund. A formal decision is likely next Tuesday. The amount will be in excess of $10,000.Council is also in the process of organising a Charity Concert to be held in early March. All of the proceeds will be donated to the Bushfire Appeal Fund.Council employees have already donated $3,000 and fundraising activities are continuing.The Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) has acknowledged Council's offer of staff and equipment. The MAV have advised that it will call on them as and when required.
COMMENT: What does in excess of $10,000 mean? I wonder if they will match Stonnington's donation? Only $3000 from nearly 800 staff (or at least 500 fulltime)? That equals about six bucks from each staff member to this stage! When one considers how many of these mandarins are earning well over 100,000, I simply wonder how much they have donated?
Bushfire update 12 February 2009
Councillors are finalising the details of the donation that Council will make to the Bushfire Appeal Fund. A formal decision is likely next Tuesday. The amount will be in excess of $10,000.Council is also in the process of organising a Charity Concert to be held in early March. All of the proceeds will be donated to the Bushfire Appeal Fund.Council employees have already donated $3,000 and fundraising activities are continuing.The Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) has acknowledged Council's offer of staff and equipment. The MAV have advised that it will call on them as and when required.
COMMENT: What does in excess of $10,000 mean? I wonder if they will match Stonnington's donation? Only $3000 from nearly 800 staff (or at least 500 fulltime)? That equals about six bucks from each staff member to this stage! When one considers how many of these mandarins are earning well over 100,000, I simply wonder how much they have donated?
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Clowncil's pathetic and shameful response!!
When I read the following, I was angry and appalled at how our wealthy clowncil has responded to the tragedy of recent days. Please read their announcement and keep in mind the following:
1. the tone - not one word is mentioned about the victims, the losses, the overall enormity of what has happened.
2. what is clowncil's 'contribution' - a few paltry and expendable staff, plus the offer of machinery 'if needed'.
3. Compare this with what other councils are doing. We're told that there were 'discussions' with stonnington and other neighbouring municipalities. I've attached the Stonnington release following the Glen Eira one. Note the difference in sentiment, and the financial donation!!
4. According to the VLGA media release some other councils are doing the following: “The Cities Ballarat, Greater Dandenong, Greater Geelong, Hume, Maribyrnong, Monash, Moreland, Melton, Stonnington, and Whitehorse, are making generous donations from $10,000 to $50,000.
“Corangamite Shire Council, which has itself been hit by the fires in some areas, has immediately organised a fundraising film night.
“The City of Port Phillip collected donations at the St Kilda Festival on Sunday and has organized for residents to make donations via the Council to relief funds. Maribyrnong City Council is also collecting donations at the Yarraville Festival this weekend and Hobsons Bay have immediately organised a fundraising event this week.
“The Cities of Moonee Valley and Whitehorse have facilitated donations of blood and plasma in response to the requests from Red Cross.
“The City of Moreland who have a number of staff who have lost their homes, are even looking at creative solutions such as special leave and cash bonuses.
“The Ballarat Council is also assisting the community to donate and transport pet supplies to the Whittlesea Animal Clinic.
“Councils have strengthened existing partnerships with the most affected areas to provide machinery and equipment including water tanks, graders and the City of Stonnington will provide the devastated Mitchell Shire with a community caravan.
“As true reflections of our citizens, Councils of all sizes have responded with equal generosity and community spirit. The City of Melbourne and Lord Mayor’s Charitable Fund have given generously - a staggering $800,000 in cash and $200,000 in kind. While both have more resources at their disposal, this lead should act as a signal to all Councils in a position to help.
“Whether this support is cash, in kind or a myriad of other creative responses, affected people are looking to Councils as a source of hope.
“While these fires have been shocking in their destruction, the overwhelming level of support from Councils signals the strength of local communities and their potential to collectively support efforts to rebuild shattered lives,” concluded Cr Iser.
Shame on you Glen Eira!! This is their pathetic media release!
Council supports bushfire affected communities
In wake of the weekends devastating bushfires, Glen Eira City Council has made whatever resources it can available to communities in the affected areas.“Council is making available staff members with expertise in emergency response, disaster administration, building safety and public health to assist municipalities that have been affected,” Glen Eira Mayor Cr Helen Whiteside said.“Council’s Depot has also made available any equipment and vehicles which may be required.“Any staff members who are members of any of the volunteer and emergency services are being supported to continue their volunteer work. One staff member who volunteers for the State Emergency Service (SES) has already been deployed into the affected areas.”Council met with the cities of Stonnington, Boroondara, Bayside and Kingston yesterday to discuss how they can best support the affected communities.Residents wanting to help are urged to make a cash donation to the Red Cross Victorian Bushfire Fund.To make a donation, contact 1800 811 700 or visit www.redcross.org.au
AND HERE'S THE STONNINGTON ONE
City of Stonnington supports bushfire victims
City of Stonnington Mayor Cr Claude Ullin has expressed, on behalf of Council and the community, his deepest regret for the tragic loss of life and devastation caused by the Victorian bushfires and committed the Council’s full support for the victims.
“This unprecedented catastrophe has sent a chill down the spine of all Victorians. It is testament to the caring nature of all Victorians that we are all seeking to help in any way we can. For its part, Stonnington Council will
next week resolve to donate $50,000 for bushfire relief. “We have also been working closely with our “sister city” Mitchell Shire, which includes the areas of Kilmore, Wandong and Heathcote Junction, to offer any resources necessary, which has included the provision of a food kitchen caravan which Council will hire and deliver to the people of Wandong who currently have no food
preparation areas,’ Cr Ullin said.
“Some City of Stonnington staff will also be seconded to Mitchell Shire during the coming weeks to assist in roles such as counseling and staffing service centres, which have been in enormous demand since the bushfires hit, in order to give Mitchell Shire staff a well-earned break.”
For the remainder of Council’s Summer events program, Rotary will be collecting money for the fire victims.
“Rotary will be collecting at Council’s Musical Melodies, Opera in the Park and Symphony Under the Stars concerts during the next month so this is an opportunity for the community to demonstrate how much they care
by giving generously,” Cr Ullin said.
“Other initiatives being considered include a fund raising concert or event to thank volunteers in the Mitchell Shire area who have assisted in the wake of the bushfires.
“People wishing to make donations, provide emergency accommodation or in need of counseling as a result of the bushfires should visit Council’s website www.stonnington.vic.gov.au for more information.
“This is a time where communities come together and can provide enormous support whether that be material, financial or otherwise. I thank you for your efforts so far and urge you to continue to be thoughtful and generous,” Cr Ullin said. What you can do:
· Donate money at Council’s outdoor events
o Musical Melodies in the Park – Sat 14 Feb, 7.30pm, Ardrie Park, Ardrie Rd, Malvern East
o Opera in the Park – Sat 21 Feb, 6.30pm, Victoria Gardens, High St, Prahran
o Symphony Under the Stars – Sat 28 Feb, 7pm, Malvern Gardens, High St, Malvern
· Donate money through the Red Cross Victorian Bushfire Appeal visit www.stonnington.vic.gov.au
· Provide Emergency Accommodation visit www.stonnington.vic.gov.au
· Donate Blood visit www.stonnington.vic.gov.au
In need of help:
· Visit www.stonnington.vic.gov.au for information on how Stonnington residents can receive support.
1. the tone - not one word is mentioned about the victims, the losses, the overall enormity of what has happened.
2. what is clowncil's 'contribution' - a few paltry and expendable staff, plus the offer of machinery 'if needed'.
3. Compare this with what other councils are doing. We're told that there were 'discussions' with stonnington and other neighbouring municipalities. I've attached the Stonnington release following the Glen Eira one. Note the difference in sentiment, and the financial donation!!
4. According to the VLGA media release some other councils are doing the following: “The Cities Ballarat, Greater Dandenong, Greater Geelong, Hume, Maribyrnong, Monash, Moreland, Melton, Stonnington, and Whitehorse, are making generous donations from $10,000 to $50,000.
“Corangamite Shire Council, which has itself been hit by the fires in some areas, has immediately organised a fundraising film night.
“The City of Port Phillip collected donations at the St Kilda Festival on Sunday and has organized for residents to make donations via the Council to relief funds. Maribyrnong City Council is also collecting donations at the Yarraville Festival this weekend and Hobsons Bay have immediately organised a fundraising event this week.
“The Cities of Moonee Valley and Whitehorse have facilitated donations of blood and plasma in response to the requests from Red Cross.
“The City of Moreland who have a number of staff who have lost their homes, are even looking at creative solutions such as special leave and cash bonuses.
“The Ballarat Council is also assisting the community to donate and transport pet supplies to the Whittlesea Animal Clinic.
“Councils have strengthened existing partnerships with the most affected areas to provide machinery and equipment including water tanks, graders and the City of Stonnington will provide the devastated Mitchell Shire with a community caravan.
“As true reflections of our citizens, Councils of all sizes have responded with equal generosity and community spirit. The City of Melbourne and Lord Mayor’s Charitable Fund have given generously - a staggering $800,000 in cash and $200,000 in kind. While both have more resources at their disposal, this lead should act as a signal to all Councils in a position to help.
“Whether this support is cash, in kind or a myriad of other creative responses, affected people are looking to Councils as a source of hope.
“While these fires have been shocking in their destruction, the overwhelming level of support from Councils signals the strength of local communities and their potential to collectively support efforts to rebuild shattered lives,” concluded Cr Iser.
Shame on you Glen Eira!! This is their pathetic media release!
Council supports bushfire affected communities
In wake of the weekends devastating bushfires, Glen Eira City Council has made whatever resources it can available to communities in the affected areas.“Council is making available staff members with expertise in emergency response, disaster administration, building safety and public health to assist municipalities that have been affected,” Glen Eira Mayor Cr Helen Whiteside said.“Council’s Depot has also made available any equipment and vehicles which may be required.“Any staff members who are members of any of the volunteer and emergency services are being supported to continue their volunteer work. One staff member who volunteers for the State Emergency Service (SES) has already been deployed into the affected areas.”Council met with the cities of Stonnington, Boroondara, Bayside and Kingston yesterday to discuss how they can best support the affected communities.Residents wanting to help are urged to make a cash donation to the Red Cross Victorian Bushfire Fund.To make a donation, contact 1800 811 700 or visit www.redcross.org.au
AND HERE'S THE STONNINGTON ONE
City of Stonnington supports bushfire victims
City of Stonnington Mayor Cr Claude Ullin has expressed, on behalf of Council and the community, his deepest regret for the tragic loss of life and devastation caused by the Victorian bushfires and committed the Council’s full support for the victims.
“This unprecedented catastrophe has sent a chill down the spine of all Victorians. It is testament to the caring nature of all Victorians that we are all seeking to help in any way we can. For its part, Stonnington Council will
next week resolve to donate $50,000 for bushfire relief. “We have also been working closely with our “sister city” Mitchell Shire, which includes the areas of Kilmore, Wandong and Heathcote Junction, to offer any resources necessary, which has included the provision of a food kitchen caravan which Council will hire and deliver to the people of Wandong who currently have no food
preparation areas,’ Cr Ullin said.
“Some City of Stonnington staff will also be seconded to Mitchell Shire during the coming weeks to assist in roles such as counseling and staffing service centres, which have been in enormous demand since the bushfires hit, in order to give Mitchell Shire staff a well-earned break.”
For the remainder of Council’s Summer events program, Rotary will be collecting money for the fire victims.
“Rotary will be collecting at Council’s Musical Melodies, Opera in the Park and Symphony Under the Stars concerts during the next month so this is an opportunity for the community to demonstrate how much they care
by giving generously,” Cr Ullin said.
“Other initiatives being considered include a fund raising concert or event to thank volunteers in the Mitchell Shire area who have assisted in the wake of the bushfires.
“People wishing to make donations, provide emergency accommodation or in need of counseling as a result of the bushfires should visit Council’s website www.stonnington.vic.gov.au for more information.
“This is a time where communities come together and can provide enormous support whether that be material, financial or otherwise. I thank you for your efforts so far and urge you to continue to be thoughtful and generous,” Cr Ullin said. What you can do:
· Donate money at Council’s outdoor events
o Musical Melodies in the Park – Sat 14 Feb, 7.30pm, Ardrie Park, Ardrie Rd, Malvern East
o Opera in the Park – Sat 21 Feb, 6.30pm, Victoria Gardens, High St, Prahran
o Symphony Under the Stars – Sat 28 Feb, 7pm, Malvern Gardens, High St, Malvern
· Donate money through the Red Cross Victorian Bushfire Appeal visit www.stonnington.vic.gov.au
· Provide Emergency Accommodation visit www.stonnington.vic.gov.au
· Donate Blood visit www.stonnington.vic.gov.au
In need of help:
· Visit www.stonnington.vic.gov.au for information on how Stonnington residents can receive support.
Friday, February 6, 2009
The clowncil way versus the 'right' way!
Below is a posting taken in its entirety from the Bayside Council website. Please note carefully the following:
1. The withdrawel of a draft proposal basically is saying 'we got it wrong' and are prepared to start again. In other words an admission of error and an 'apology' perhaps.
2. The commitment to a variety of 'consultation methods'.
3. How this stands in stark contrast to what happens in our clowncil.
4. The opportunity to post comments directly to council via the website!
Read and weep!
Council listens to community’s concerns over Bayside's sportsgrounds - Friday 06 February 2009
BAYSIDE City Council has withdrawn its current Draft Sportsground and Draft Open Space strategies from public comment and will review its approach to community consultation on these issues.
Bayside Mayor Councillor James Long said the decision came after community members sent Council a clear message that more consultation was needed.
“The community is also dissatisfied with some of the proposed changes to the sportsgrounds.
“We have heard loud and clear what the community want and we now understand that we need to be clearer in our communications and do better consultation on these issues.
Bayside City Council held two community information sessions on the Draft Sportsground Strategy this week. Although Council has withdrawn both the existing draft Sportsground and Open Space strategies, feedback from community members will be considered when developing an integrated strategy.
“I would like to thank all the people who took the time to attend the community information sessions to give us their feedback. Your input is valuable and will help shape our way forward.
“Council at all times likes to make decisions for the greatest benefit of the community; and this applies to both our current and future communities,” Cr Long said.
Council will ensure that widespread community consultation utilising a variety of approaches underpins the new strategy.
For more information, visit the Have Your Say section of the website.
1. The withdrawel of a draft proposal basically is saying 'we got it wrong' and are prepared to start again. In other words an admission of error and an 'apology' perhaps.
2. The commitment to a variety of 'consultation methods'.
3. How this stands in stark contrast to what happens in our clowncil.
4. The opportunity to post comments directly to council via the website!
Read and weep!
Council listens to community’s concerns over Bayside's sportsgrounds - Friday 06 February 2009
BAYSIDE City Council has withdrawn its current Draft Sportsground and Draft Open Space strategies from public comment and will review its approach to community consultation on these issues.
Bayside Mayor Councillor James Long said the decision came after community members sent Council a clear message that more consultation was needed.
“The community is also dissatisfied with some of the proposed changes to the sportsgrounds.
“We have heard loud and clear what the community want and we now understand that we need to be clearer in our communications and do better consultation on these issues.
Bayside City Council held two community information sessions on the Draft Sportsground Strategy this week. Although Council has withdrawn both the existing draft Sportsground and Open Space strategies, feedback from community members will be considered when developing an integrated strategy.
“I would like to thank all the people who took the time to attend the community information sessions to give us their feedback. Your input is valuable and will help shape our way forward.
“Council at all times likes to make decisions for the greatest benefit of the community; and this applies to both our current and future communities,” Cr Long said.
Council will ensure that widespread community consultation utilising a variety of approaches underpins the new strategy.
For more information, visit the Have Your Say section of the website.
Monday, February 2, 2009
More genuises at work!
Well the mulching story continues, but now there is even further evidence of 'genuises at work'!!! Guess what this clowncil and its morons have done - they've placed a foot of mulch around 3 DEAD TREES!!! Perhaps they are blind as well as stupid? That could be the only possible explanation for this latest effort! Monty Python would have a ball with this mob and their incompetence.
Friday, January 30, 2009
Once more without (sense) or feeling!
I've been reliably told that once again mulch was being piled up a foot high against thirsty and suffering trees in 45 degree heat! Once again, there was no watering beforehand; no drip systems; no sunken pipes down to the roots, no nothing! This is horticultural vandalism and sheer ignorance. Even when it does rain, the chances of seeping through 12 inches of bark, ground up leaves and other such matter, is nigh impossible. Again, I ask - which idiot is responsible for this? who determines when and how our parks are taken care of? why isn't clowncil investing in more water trucks rather than piling tons of dirt onto already dying trees? I've only ever seen two water trucks actually watering trees in parks in the last 5 years. Has anyone else ever observed them? Please let us know if you have.
Friday, January 23, 2009
Shoddy, shoddy, shoddy clowncil
In previous posts I have attempted to highlight the shoddy practices that are undertaken in the name of this clowncil. The sage continues. During this week, when the temperature was soaring, and we hadn't had rain for ages, two tip trucks full of mulch came along and dumped their cargo around half a dozen mature trees. Good you might say - clowncil looking after our parks and the environment! But is this really best practice? As any good gardener and they will tell you that mulching MUST BE DONE AFTER WATERING! Otherwise, all that is achieved is a thick covering which prevents any rain from getting to the roots of trees and plants. We now have mulch that is 6 inches thick doing exactly this. Why weren't the surrounds of these trees watered prior to the dumping of truckloads of mulch? Again, whose brainchild is this? Where is the logic, and the credibility? But of course - mulching on parched dry land that no-one can see under, looks as if clowncil is really doing their job well, doesn't it? Also, we can now look at clowncil 'statistics' and be told that 5 million trees have been mulched. Wonderful stuff isn't it?
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Another clowncil fan!
From today's Glen Eira Leader -
CULTURE OF RESPECT
Glen Eira Council's Director of Communications, Paul Burke, statesL "when proven safety issues exist, it is the council's practice to deal with the issue rather than to discuss the issue" ("Clash over Crossing, Leader, December 23).
This rather defensive, and unfortunately common style of response from Br Burke is clearly based upon a false dichotomy. Dealing well and efficiently with issues is not incompatible with effective consultation about them. Inclusive processes are more likely to lead to better solutions and receive greater community support.
However, it does require a willingness to listen to and respect all views, and to create a culture that facilitates that.
It would be fantastic if these were to become the council's practice and it seems reasonable to expect that it should.
Bro Sheffield-Brotherton, Elsternwick.
COMMENT: There is nothing new in the above letter. Residents have for years and years been treated with this same lack of respect by Burke. The real question however, if what are this latest crop of councillors going to do about it? When letters and statements go out in their name, will they continue to remain silent? Will this silence continue to condone the sheer arrogance of Burke and the other henchmen that constitute the administration of this clowncil? These are the crucial questions that the public wants answered - not by words but by actions. A whole new raft of amendments, resolutions, etc. are required and hopefully the appointment of new officials who can deal with the public in a manner that is not adversarial, arrogant and offensive.
CULTURE OF RESPECT
Glen Eira Council's Director of Communications, Paul Burke, statesL "when proven safety issues exist, it is the council's practice to deal with the issue rather than to discuss the issue" ("Clash over Crossing, Leader, December 23).
This rather defensive, and unfortunately common style of response from Br Burke is clearly based upon a false dichotomy. Dealing well and efficiently with issues is not incompatible with effective consultation about them. Inclusive processes are more likely to lead to better solutions and receive greater community support.
However, it does require a willingness to listen to and respect all views, and to create a culture that facilitates that.
It would be fantastic if these were to become the council's practice and it seems reasonable to expect that it should.
Bro Sheffield-Brotherton, Elsternwick.
COMMENT: There is nothing new in the above letter. Residents have for years and years been treated with this same lack of respect by Burke. The real question however, if what are this latest crop of councillors going to do about it? When letters and statements go out in their name, will they continue to remain silent? Will this silence continue to condone the sheer arrogance of Burke and the other henchmen that constitute the administration of this clowncil? These are the crucial questions that the public wants answered - not by words but by actions. A whole new raft of amendments, resolutions, etc. are required and hopefully the appointment of new officials who can deal with the public in a manner that is not adversarial, arrogant and offensive.
Monday, January 12, 2009
Water, water - going nowhere!
Incompetency and sheer waste has once again reared its ugly head in the kingdom of this clowncil. A couple of days ago I observed clowncil's 'watering truck' at work. What did the operator do, like any normal, sensible human being would? Did he get out of his truck? Did he really ensure that this precious water was being used to best effect? Of course not!!! He sat in the truck and aimed the hose at this poor suffering exhibit of nature. The result? The force of the water blasted the mulch all over the place, and the water itself ran every which way. Because there was also a slight slope, I would hazard a guess that most of the water was lost, running off into gutters. Again, I ask - who supervises? who works out the protocols and 'best practice' for these basic necessities? who is responsible for such inefficiency and wastage? how much does this bloke earn? and how much of our ratepayers' money is being 'washed down the drain' through these continual stuff ups?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)